WiMAX Act 2: 802.16m Provides Evolution Path to 4G
As current-generation 802.16e mobile WiMAX networks are deployed globally, work continues on the next generation of the technology known as 802.16m, which will provide greater performance, capacity and flexibility over existing legacy networks.
Wireless Broadband Perspectives - WiMAX.com Weekly Series Sponsored By: For the next several months, WiMAX.com and Cisco will be featuring weekly topics and perspectives from the WiMAX & wireless broadband industries. This week, we talked with the WiMAX standard's groups at Intel and Cisco on the latest developments with 802.16m and what it means for operators and their customers. |
Broadband wireless technologies have continued to evolve to keep pace with the
ever-growing demand for high-bandwidth data requirements and applications.
From proprietary BWA (broadband wireless access) technologies came fixed WiMAX
in 2004 based on the IEEE 802.16d standard - providing a common platform for
fixed and nomadic wireless broadband services.
Recognizing the importance of mobility, the WiMAX Forum™ released the mobile
WiMAX profile in 2005 based on the IEEE 802.16e standard - providing full
mobility in addition to fixed and nomadic broadband services. Advanced
antenna designs including MIMO (multiple-input/multiple-output) along with other
techniques including adaptive beamforming were subsequently added to increase
performance, capacity and coverage of the networks.
While mobile WiMAX provided performance capabilities that far exceeded other
standard technologies currently available to date, it still fell short of the
International Telecom Union's (ITU) key requirements for consideration as an IMT
advanced (4G) technology - specifically, providing downlink speeds of 100 Mbps
in a wide area with high-mobility. Last October at the ITU Telecom World
2009 conference in Geneva, Switzerland, the WiMAX Forum™ and member companies
announced their support of the IEEE's submission to the ITU of the 802.16m
standard as a candidate for consideration as an IMT advanced technology.
The WiMAX Forum also announced that WiMAX Release 2, which is based on the
standard, would be finalized in parallel with 802.16m, to ensure that the next
generation of WiMAX networks and devices will remain backward compatible with
WiMAX networks based on 802.16e. (It's worth noting that the first release
of LTE also does not meet ITU's definition as a 4G technology).
"Work on the standard has been progressing very quickly," says Jose Puthenkulam,
Intel's director of WiMAX standards. "The profile development time for
802.16m has been much shorter than with the prior, 802.16e profile - where the
industry was still very much in a formulative state with respect to MIMO,
beamforming, etc. We have taken the experiences with 802.16e and even some
of the learnings from LTE and built that into the 802.16m standard."
While some companies are taking a "wait-and-see" approach before committing to
the technology, companies expressing support include Beceem and Intel on the
chip side, and Samsung, Huawei, ZTE, Alvarion and Cisco on the infrastructure
side. Recent reports in the media of Clearwire being "in no hurry to test
802.16m" seem to have been taken out of context. According to Clearwire
CTO John Saw, the operator will consider preliminary trials in 2011, which is in
line with when the first available commercial equipment will be available.
Understandably, Clearwire is more focused on growing their existing network and
POPs coverage from 30 million to 120 million in 2010 based on commercial
equipment that is available today.
Of all the WiMAX member companies, none has been more vocal in their commitment
to 802.16m than Samsung and Russian WiMAX operator Yota. Last October at
the ITU World conference, Yota and Samsung demonstrated a test of an 802.16m
network and Yota plans to be one of the first operators in the world to install
the technology once it becomes available. As one of the fastest growing
WiMAX operators in the world, Yota can certainly use the extra capacity.
In one month alone last year, the service provider carried over 2,290 terabytes
of data on its network.
What is the Significance of 802.16m to Operators?
While 802.16m will provide increased performance for users, the main, driving
factor for operators adopting the technology will be capacity. With more
users with smartphones, tablets and other devices, wireless bandwidth will
continue to grow.
"The driving force behind the development of 802.16m is capacity," says Intel's
Jose Puthenkulam. "As you start to add more use, you start to see more
capacity constraints. This will provide capacity for operators to grow
their networks."
The new 802.16m standard will also provide increased performance advantages.
From a technological perspective, 802.16m is capable of providing up to 120 Mbps
down and 60 Mbps up in an urban setting, using 4x2 MIMO antennas on a single
20MHz-wide channel. Even higher data rates can be achieved with additional
spectrum resources or more complex antenna schemes. While impressive,
actual commercial performance will be considerably less based on spectrum used
and other factors.
In addition to capacity and performance advantages, 802.16m will be backward
compatible with existing WiMAX networks, providing ease-of-mind for operators
deploying networks today. Most mobile WiMAX operators can easily convert
from 802.16e to 802.16m by updating some circuit plate units and software in
their bases stations. All of the 802.16e units in the field will continue
to work and customers will see no disruption in service.
"One of the most important aspects of the 802.16m networks will be the backwards
compatibility with legacy systems," says Dave Marez with Cisco. "Because
of this, operators don't have to wait for time to market to deploy their
networks and they will never have to worry about "orphaning" their existing
devices."
LTE vs. WiMAX? It Depends on the Spectrum…
Of course, no discussion of the future of WiMAX is complete without the context
of how it compares with other technologies - specifically LTE (long term
evolution). Both LTE and WiMAX Release 2 achieve their extraordinary
performance and capacity by providing the ability to support wider 20MHz
channels (in addition to 10MHZ channels). But performance is only as good
as the spectrum available.
Performance of an LTE network was recently highlighted in the launch of
TeliaSonera's commercial network in Stockholm. According to the company's
web site, the operator was offering down load speeds of "up to 50 Mbps," but
according to initial independent tests, only reached about 12 Mbps on the down
link. Subsequent test provided slightly better results, but showed some of
the limitations and uncertainties inherent with new technologies.
It is also worth noting that the TeliaSonera LTE network was able to deliver its
extraordinary performance because it was operating using two, 20MHz channels -
one for the downlink and one for the uplink. Essentially, the channel size
is the size of the "wireless pipe" that operators have to work with when
delivering data to users on their networks. Most 3G networks operate using
up to 5MHz channels, WiMAX 802.16e networks operate using up to 10MHz, and
802.16m and LTE networks will operate using up to 20MHz channels.
To achieve the significantly higher performance as reported by TeliaSonera, LTE
operators need to use the wider 20MHz channels, but that spectrum is not always
readily available. In the US, Verizon which is planning to deploy its LTE
network in 700 MHZ only has two, 11MHz channels nation-wide. ATT, which
also plans to deploy an LTE network, only has two, 12 MHZ channels.
"Lots of the spectrum allocation are in 10MHz chunks," says Intel's Jose
Puthenkulam. "The places you will find contiguous 20MHz channels do exist,
but they are few and far between."
The 802.16m profile is currently under evaluation and is expected to be ratified
along with WiMAX Release 2 later this year. We should then expect to start
seeing the first 802.16m dongles in late 2011 and more wide-spread commercial
deployments starting in 2012.
IEEE 802.16m is a conundrum for WiMAX players +slides
The reason for the lackluster support is simple- 802.16e based networks have yet to reach critical mass in most countries (Russia is an exception). With LTE being available around the same time frame as 802.16m (2012 in our opinion), most operators are playing a wait and see game. Why spend critical engineering resources on the day after tommorrow's network, when tommorrow's network is not fully built out yet?
However, there continues to be academic interest in 802.16m as evidenced by the strong attendance at the Dec 2009 IEEE SPS-ComSoc SCV meeting.
Alan J Weissberger
IEEE ComSoc SCV Chair, ComSoc Community web manager, Member IEEE On Line Content Board of Directors and ComSoc CIO office
http://www.wimax360.com/forum/topics/any-interest-in-ieee-80216m?xg_source=activity
You can view Intel's 802.16m presentation from that meeting at:
http://ewh.ieee.org/r6/scv/sps/JK_Fwu_IEEE-802.16m.pdf
Note that this coming Wed Feb 10th IEEE SPS and ComSoc SCV are co-sponsoring a Clearwire Panel session where 802.16m will be disucssed.

Let's call everything 4G
We know, based on historical data, that the time for new technology inception to mass market release has varied roughly between 10-15 years during which, depending on the technology, many highs and lows and metaphoric states of deep-freeze, coma, death, and sometimes re-birth were experienced.
The stakes have grown larger when the game-changing notion of ubiquitous broadband wireless technology was introduced at the most recent re-birth of such notion some time around 2002. During the period since, we have toyed with consumers’ emotions and wallets with over-hyped claims of standard based technology readiness (for mass deployment) such as 802.16d (fixed WiMAX), 802.16e (mobile WiMAX) all with many derivatives such as 16k, g, I, h…etc. with each version attempting to fix its predecessor’s incompleteness; followed by 802.16m, which is still under development (4G spec. Advanced Air Interface with data rates of 100 Mbit/s mobile & 1 Gbit/s fixed). The cellular world has done its share by keeping us preoccupied with their confusing permutations of 3G (i.e. 3.5G. 3.75G, 3.9G) with each permutation branching out to many technology derivatives which largely included what the 3G was supposed to be when it was released. But, neither side (WiMAX or LTE) could resist the temptation to call them 4G!
While this type of technology progression makes perfect sense and is completely normal in the development labs and in the technical community, it has wreaked havoc in the commercial arena. Both LTE and WiMAX have been touting their false claims of offering a 4G technology while, at best, they are on a path which is hoped to eventually achieve 4G, and while they are engulfed with the seemingly never-ending tasks of fixing the 3G shortcomings. Yet in the interim, they have been selling their wares as 4G.
While 4G technology is real and coming, I maintain that marketing ploys claiming that it has somehow arrived as far back as three years ago is irresponsible and hurtful to business growth down the road. It is particularly important to point out the notorious reputation and track record of broadband wireless from the standpoint of range, bandwidth and in general quality of service from the start up to now as we speak! Let’s take WiMAX as an example.
The industry, while in heavy discord, certified and released 802.16d (Fixed WiMAX) products, only to immediately amend it (to 802.16e /mobile standard) shortly after. This caused the customer community making a hard stop on their tracks directing their attention to 802.16e products which were billed as everything to everybody except that the technology was not ready, as it was claimed, and remained not ready for over two years after!
This little marketing faux pas caused many companies (both on the vendor side and the customer side) to go bankrupt with growing suspicion and credibility gap surrounding any technology’s content and readiness. The artificial and premature release of closely timed successive technologies into the business arena, has forced untimely obsolescence of technologies that had required an enormous amount of investment to develop, but were left with no space to emerge properly and provide both investors and adopters the opportunity to recoup their investment and profit from technology deployment. And the pattern continues!